PeptideScouterPeptideScouterIndex

Peptide Price Index, July 2026: One Vendor Raised 10%

· Updated Friday, August 14, 2026 · Price Index

This is the third issue of a monthly index of listed research peptide prices, following the May and June issues.

July had a shape the first two months did not: the largest vendor in the index raised prices across nearly its entire catalog, three vendors cut, and the market as a whole finished the month within a nickel of where it started.

What was measured

Prices are compared listing against listing, between the first week of July and the last. A listing counts only if it was in stock and priced in both.

Full definitions are on the methodology page.

Prices stayed sticky for a third month

Of the 846 listings, 644 (76%) ended July at exactly the price they started it. That is the third consecutive month in the same band: 78% in May, 88% in June, 76% in July. Whatever else moves in this market, most listed prices sit still for weeks at a time.

Among the 202 listings that did move, 114 fell and 88 rose, and the median mover fell 3.14%.

As of July 31, 2026, the median listed price across the compounds in the index was $4.90 per milligram, against $4.92 a month earlier. Half of all listings fell between $3.00 and $7.00 per milligram.

One vendor raised, three cut

Those four vendors are the month. Everything else was a listing or two at a time, and the two directions came close to cancelling out, which is why the market level barely moved while a quarter of it repriced.

The largest single increase was BPC-157 at Alpha Peptides, up 43.0% from $1.82 to $2.60 per milligram. The largest decrease on a single compound was pinealon at Ascension Peptides, down 37.7% from $8.50 to $5.30 per milligram.

The same compound still costs 3x more at one vendor than another

The gap between the cheapest and most expensive listing of the same compound remains the largest number in this market, and it did not move in July. Among compounds carried by five or more vendors, the median one costs about three times as much at its dearest listing as at its cheapest. That is where it has sat since we began publishing this index.

These are the widest, as of July 31, 2026.

Tirzepatide held the widest gap in both previous issues at 16.5-fold, and no longer does. Its most expensive listings came down over the month, but its cheapest did not.

The FDA vote did not move prices

The PCAC vote of July 23-24, in which an FDA advisory committee recommended six of seven peptides for the 503A compounding list, produced no price response through the end of the month.

Prices on the voted peptides changed about as often as everything else (26.3% of their listings against 23.4% of the rest), and the median change was zero in both groups. That covers six of the seven. The seventh, TB-500, is not the molecule vendors sell under that name, and almost nobody lists the one the panel voted on.

Nothing here rules out a price response later. A recommendation is not a rule, and the rulemaking that would change anything is months away at the earliest.

What this does not measure

Sources

All figures in this report are as of July 31, 2026, computed from the archive as of publication.

Suggested citation: PeptideScouter. Peptide Price Index, July 2026. https://peptidescouter.com/blog/peptide-price-index-july-2026 (figures as of Friday, July 31, 2026).

PeptideScouter indexes vendor prices for research chemicals sold for laboratory use only, not for human consumption. Nothing here is medical, legal, or investment advice. We earn affiliate commissions on some outbound vendor links - see our disclosure.